Sterling Heights Stevenson's projected record is 5.7 - 3.3
| Date | Team | Gpoop Rating | Point Spread | Win Prob. | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug. 28, 2025 | Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 85.0% |
41 |
|
| Temperance Bedford | 12.1
| 20.1 |
15.0% |
0 |
|
| Sept. 5, 2025 | Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 59.0% |
21 |
|
| Utica | 25.5
| 6.7 |
41.0% |
7 |
|
| Sept. 12, 2025 | Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 73.0% |
24 |
|
| Clinton Township Chippewa Valley | 21.0
| 11.2 |
27.0% |
21 |
|
| Sept. 19, 2025 | Macomb Dakota | 35.6
| 53.0% |
28 |
|
| Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 3.4 |
47.0% |
14 |
|
| Sept. 26, 2025 | Utica Eisenhower | 34.7
| 53.0% |
15 |
|
| Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 2.6 |
47.0% |
3 |
|
| Oct. 3, 2025 | Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 85.0% |
||
| New Baltimore Anchor Bay | 12.5
| 19.7 |
15.0% |
||
| Oct. 10, 2025 | Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 43.0% |
||
| Romeo | 38.0
| -5.8 |
57.0% |
||
| Oct. 17, 2025 | Macomb L'Anse Creuse North | -0.1
| 4.0% |
||
| Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| -32.3 |
96.0% |
||
| Oct. 24, 2025 | Bloomfield Hills Brother Rice | 34.4
| 52.0% |
||
| Sterling Heights Stevenson | 32.2
| 2.2 |
48.0% |
Sterling Heights Stevenson's most likely first round playoff opponent is Macomb Dakota
| First Round Opponent | Odds You Play Them | Gpoop Rating | Point Spread | Win Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macomb Dakota | 29.4% | 35.6
| 3.4 |
47.0% |
| Romeo | 24.5% | 38.0
| 5.8 |
43.0% |
| Utica | 13.9% | 25.5
| -6.7 |
59.0% |
| Utica Eisenhower | 7.8% | 34.7
| 2.6 |
47.0% |
| Detroit Cass Tech | 4.7% | 47.8
| 15.6 |
19.0% |
| West Bloomfield | 3.7% | 54.6
| 22.5 |
12.0% |
| Brownstown Woodhaven | 2.7% | 43.1
| 10.9 |
27.0% |
| Rochester Adams | 2.1% | 54.1
| 21.9 |
12.0% |
| Dearborn Fordson | 1.7% | 23.5
| -8.6 |
65.0% |
| Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 1.3% | 43.0
| 10.8 |
27.0% |
| Troy | 0.3% | 5.9
| -26.3 |
93.0% |
| Farmington | 0.2% | 23.6
| -8.6 |
65.0% |
| Dearborn | 0.1% | 3.0
| -29.1 |
96.0% |
| First Round Opponent | Odds You Play Them | Gpoop Rating | Point Spread | Win Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macomb Dakota | 14.1% | 35.6
| 3.4 |
47.0% |
| Romeo | 11.5% | 38.0
| 5.8 |
43.0% |
| Utica | 6.7% | 25.5
| -6.7 |
59.0% |
| Utica Eisenhower | 4.0% | 34.7
| 2.6 |
47.0% |
| Detroit Cass Tech | 2.9% | 47.8
| 15.6 |
19.0% |
| Rochester Adams | 0.7% | 54.1
| 21.9 |
12.0% |
| Dearborn Fordson | 0.4% | 23.5
| -8.6 |
65.0% |
| Brownstown Woodhaven | 0.3% | 43.1
| 10.9 |
27.0% |
| Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 0.3% | 43.0
| 10.8 |
27.0% |
| West Bloomfield | 0.1% | 54.6
| 22.5 |
12.0% |
| First Round Opponent | Odds You Play Them | Gpoop Rating | Point Spread | Win Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rochester Adams | 9.3% | 54.1
| 21.9 |
12.0% |
| Detroit Cass Tech | 2.4% | 47.8
| 15.6 |
19.0% |
| Rochester Hills Stoney Creek | 2.3% | 43.0
| 10.8 |
27.0% |
| Brownstown Woodhaven | 2.2% | 43.1
| 10.9 |
27.0% |
| Utica Eisenhower | 0.9% | 34.7
| 2.6 |
47.0% |
| West Bloomfield | 0.7% | 54.6
| 22.5 |
12.0% |
| Romeo | 0.7% | 38.0
| 5.8 |
43.0% |
| Oxford | 0.3% | 36.6
| 4.4 |
46.0% |
| Dearborn Fordson | 0.3% | 23.5
| -8.6 |
65.0% |
| Belleville | 0.1% | 29.0
| -3.2 |
53.0% |
| Macomb Dakota | 0.1% | 35.6
| 3.4 |
47.0% |
| First Round Opponent | Odds You Play Them | Gpoop Rating | Point Spread | Win Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saline | 1.3% | 58.4
| 26.2 |
7.0% |
| Detroit Cass Tech | 0.8% | 47.8
| 15.6 |
19.0% |
| Rochester Adams | 0.5% | 54.1
| 21.9 |
12.0% |
| Detroit Catholic Central | 0.5% | 60.1
| 27.9 |
5.0% |
| West Bloomfield | 0.4% | 54.6
| 22.5 |
12.0% |
| Brownstown Woodhaven | 0.3% | 43.1
| 10.9 |
27.0% |
| Grand Blanc | 0.2% | 54.6
| 22.4 |
12.0% |
| Clarkston | 0.2% | 56.1
| 23.9 |
10.0% |
| First Round Opponent | Odds You Play Them | Gpoop Rating | Point Spread | Win Prob. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detroit Catholic Central | 0.2% | 60.1
| 27.9 |
5.0% |
| East Kentwood | 0.2% | 61.6
| 29.4 |
4.0% |
| Rockford | 0.2% | 56.8
| 24.6 |
8.5% |
| Clarkston | 0.1% | 56.1
| 23.9 |
10.0% |
This is how Sterling Heights Stevenson's rating has trended, relative to the rest of the MHSAA